TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mark Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Mark Stevens <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:42:20 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (44 lines)
Hi all. TBL instructors often wonder what they should do when one team 
finishes a team exercise before the other teams. Like many of you, I try 
to think of an additional activity or question for the early finishers 
to work on while the other teams finish up. I tried something new 
yesterday that seemed to work well, but I have some concerns and wanted 
to see if you think my concerns are warranted.

One team in my class yesterday finished much earlier than I was 
expecting, so I gave them a few additional tasks to work on while the 
other team continued working on the exercise. Once the early-finishing 
team had completed its additional tasks (and it was clear that the other 
team was still going to be working on the exercise for a while), I 
decided to sit down with the early-finishing team to debrief their work 
on the extra tasks. I enjoyed this debriefing session, and it kept the 
team members more engaged in the class and material than they otherwise 
would have been. I got to cover some non-essential but nevertheless 
relevant material with that team that I wouldn't have been able to cover 
in the post exercise discussion, because I knew there would only be time 
to discuss the essential material. Overall, I think this debriefing 
session was valuable for the early-finishing team.

My concern, though, is whether it is problematic to spend time chatting 
with one time while the other team is working on the exercise. I don't 
think our chatting was a distraction to the still-working team, but the 
team that I chatted with had an opportunity to "learn more" than the 
team that was still working, which could be viewed as "unfair". On the 
other hand, more learning is arguably better than less learning, even if 
the the "more learning" is unevenly distributed across the students.

Does anyone have any thoughts on this issue?

Thanks,
Mark

-- 
Mark Stevens, PhD, MCIP
Assistant Professor, School of Community & Regional Planning
University of British Columbia
223-1933 West Mall
Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
SCARP bio: http://www.scarp.ubc.ca/people/mark-stevens
Planning Evaluation Lab: http://www.planningevaluationlab.ca
604-822-0657

ATOM RSS1 RSS2