TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Kramer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Michael Kramer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Dec 2012 10:48:13 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
It is becoming clearer and clearer to me that I want to have significant
changes in the outcomes my students experience in my course, yet I am
reluctant to venture too far out of my comfort zone.

Thanks for giving me that extra nudge.

I now realize that I can change my objective to "write an effective
analytical paper."

Since philosophy is, by its very nature, abstract, I had a lot of difficulty
conceiving realistic applications. (Give an example Plato's principle of
opposites in a restaurant? How would you use Hume's views of induction in
forecasting iPad sales in 2013? Explain the York College course registration
process from a Nietzschean perspective?)

What this exchange has done is shifted my perspective. My goal is eminently
concrete: develop effective writers. The philosophical content (Plato, Hume,
Nietzsche) is not the end but the means. The philosophy texts are the
vehicle, not the destination.

Thank you!

Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2