TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Davidson, Lindsay" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Davidson, Lindsay
Date:
Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:51:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Similar issue, here, at Queen's. We call real TBL "TBL". We call other stuff "SGL" for "Small group learning" in a large classroom format. The latter tends to be application exercise-ish. That being said, some of us (me) are gently moving groups who have had success with SGL to true TBL. The differentiation in name I think has been instrumental in helping students understand what is going on. Also, it has been rewarding to see the iterative cycle of improvement in new groups adopting this, not because of inner passion for the method, but because of external decree. Year 2 tends to be a lot better than year 1.

L

Lindsay Davidson M.D., M.Sc., M.Ed., FRCSC
Associate Professor, Pediatric Orthopaedics
Chair of Teaching and Learning,
School of Medicine Director Years 3 and 4,
Undergraduate MSK Course Director,
Queen's University, Kingston, Ont
(613)544-9626; Fax (866)-545-1519


This email may contain information that is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this message in error should notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete it from his or her computer.

Ce courriel peut contenir des renseignements confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, veuillez prendre note que la divulgation, la distribution ou la reproduction de cette communication sont strictement interdites. Si vous avez reçu cette communication par erreur, veuillez immédiatement en avertir l'expéditeur par retour de ce courriel, et supprimer la communication de votre ordinateur.





-----Original Message-----
From: Team-Based Learning on behalf of Emke, Amanda R.
Sent: Sun 11/20/2011 9:22 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: 
 
Nancy,

At our medical school, there are only 2 of us who use TBL and we use it in the same year (2nd). Because our students get so little exposure to it, we do things slightly different with team formation. Therefore, someone else should comment on team formation once you have multiple classes using TBL.

That being said, one of the frustrations our students expressed was when the 2 of us or (and this was especially a problem) when people said they were using TBL but it wasn't really TBL. To combat this, we crafted a very specific document to instruct other facilitators. In this way, the students know what to expect from anyone who says they are doing TBL. The document gives a definition of TBL, why we use TBL, and then specifics of TBL dynamics and flow as well as a detailed explanation of the appeals process.

We have found that creating this document has been invaluable. Instructors have stopped calling non-TBL sessions TBL which decreases student frustration. We also have a means by which to re-focus students when they claim ignorance of the process.

Amanda


Amanda R. Emke, MD
     Instructor, Divisions of Pediatric Critical Care
                     & Hospital Medicine
     Course Master, Pre-Clinical Pediatrics
     Washington University School of Medicine
     St. Louis Children's Hospital
     One Children's Place, NWT CB 8116
     St. Louis, MO 63110
     314-454-2678
     [log in to unmask]

________________________________
From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nancy Sohler
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 1:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject:

Hi-I've been using TBL in my Introduction to Epidemiology course in a BS/MD program.  I teach in the third year.  The instructor who teaches Introduction to Demography/Health Statistics (which introduces many of the epidemiology and biostatistics topics applied in my course) has decided also to use some aspects of TBL in his course next year.  He teaches one semester before I do.  In our school, the entire cohort of students takes all classes together.  (Thus, those in the 2nd year class, will be the exact same students in the 3rd year class.) Also, the material covered in the 3rd year is an in depth extension of the same material covered in the 2nd year.

I am concerned about a couple of problems.
1) I set up teams in a way that everyone sees how the team formation is done: I have everyone line up in the class room, then ask those with strong biostatistics skills to move to the front (<10% of the class), and continue like this with a series of skills that I think are relevant to understanding Epidemiology.  I then ask the students to stand next to their best friend (hoping to break up these tight pairs that ruin group cohesion). I have students count off, and create groups of 6-7 students.  If the students are aware of this process, they will "game" the process and make sure that they end up in teams with their friends (these are very young students with very close ties to their friends).  If the instructor before me sets up groups, making this process very transparent, I'm worried that it will negatively impact on my group formation.  How can I avoid this, keeping the process transparent? (Remember the relevant skills are the same in both classes...)

2) I have the students vote on the grading process during the first day of class.  The final exam counts for 40% of the grade.  The other 3 components of the grade are: IRATS, GRATS (and group assignments), and peer evaluations.  Each of those 3 must count for at least 10% of the grade.  Voting on grades has done wonders in allowing the students to feel a part of the development of the course and the grading process. I have never had complaints about grades, since they were part of establishing the process.  However, if the students have had prior experience with TBL, this voting process will reflect their experience of the value of groups grades (always higher than individual grades), perhaps to an extreme.  Should I omit the process of voting for grades in this case, as the outcome will be very clear (40% group, 10% IRAT, and 10% peer), and force the IRATS to be worth more to force the students to spend time on studying for IRATS?  Again, our students are very grade-oriented, and are more concerned with getting A's than developing good study habits at this point.

I would appreciate any other advice from folks who teach TBL courses with the same class of students over a number of years. Are there things that the year 2 instructor and I should coordinate? Are there problems that he and I should know about ahead of time?

Thanks!



The materials in this email are private and may contain Protected Health Information. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return email.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2