TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Team-Based Learning <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Oct 2014 10:21:40 -0500
Reply-To:
Cindy Stanfield <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Cindy Stanfield <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Comments:
To: Andrew W Keitt <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I let the team appeal that there are 2 correct answers.

Cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Andrew W Keitt
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 8:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Individual appeals

I know that appeals are only granted to teams, but I'm have some push back
on this policy and am having trouble justifying it. Let's say there are
two answers and there is a good case to be made that they are equally
plausible-the team picks the "correct" answer, but the individual student,
although she has made a good argument for her choice, is out of luck. In a
big class it's not feasible to entertain each individual appeal, but apart
from logistics I'm having a hard time justifying it.

Does anyone have a suggestion for how to deal with this?

Thanks!

Andrew Keitt

ATOM RSS1 RSS2