Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:19:33 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks, Larry!
I think any label we put on these will of course be sensitive to context.
For example, I am working with a teacher who did not want to use the word "Quiz" because she felt it was *too* scary!
She decided to go with "assessments."
-M
-----Original Message-----
From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Larry Michaelsen
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 9:16 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: iRAT/gRAT
I'm impressed with the number of thoughtful suggestions. I think there are two principles involved:
1) Don't miss the opportunity to remind your students (and yourself) WHY you are giving the tests--to be sure they are equipped to deal with what's really important--the applications. Thus, DO NOT CALL THEM QUIZZES. They need the reminder and so do you.
2) Use language that teaches but, also language that is comfortable for both you and your students. I've even changed in the last couple of years (from Readiness Assessment Tests to Readiness Assurance Tests) because I think Assurance is a better reminder of what I'm trying to accomplish than Assessments.
Larry
--
Larry K. Michaelsen
Professor of Management
University of Central Missouri
Dockery 400G
Warrensburg, MO 64093
[log in to unmask] <---PLEASE NOTE NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS !!!
660/543-4124 voice
660/543-8465 fax
>>> Juli Dunn <[log in to unmask]> 01/15/09 11:54 AM >>>
Can anyone suggest better names for the readiness assessment tests? For
whatever reason I would like something that doesn't spell RAT. I have
played with iRAQ (other issues) and gRAQ. Any suggestions woudl be
greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Juli
**
Julia L Dunn, AT/L, MA
Director of Academic Resources
Associate Professor
Whitman College
Memorial Hall 205B
345 Boyer Avenue
Walla Walla, WA 99362
[log in to unmask]
509.527.5013 (office)
509.301.6824 (cell)
|
|
|