Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Aug 2008 15:26:35 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As a 'newbie' to TBL, I may be a bit off in the following response to
Lance's question, but here goes - how about as a part of the writing
learning process you have the small groups critique (as in try to find and
correct) papers written either by current students or previous semester
students. I doubt you'll have any problem finding samples of papers that
have been poorly written; just make sure the names have been removed. So
it would go something like this: you do a lesson on the correct way to
write a title page, the students form small groups and critique samples of
incorrectly written title pages, then write their own individual title
pages. Each component/lesson could be designed this way.
What do others think?
Chuck Killingsworth
> I teach Freshman composition. I.e. a class that has individual papers as
> the primary grading
> criteria, and frankly, as the entire point of the class. Team learning
> sounds fascinating, but
> antithetical to the nature of my class. A person must learn to write a
> paper on their own.
> To do otherwise is to breach academic integrity, at least of this class.
> (One cannot
> represent as one's own work the work of someone else, nor of a
> collaboration.) Is there a
> work around to a class that demands individual projects as the fundamental
> grading criterion.
>
>
|
|
|