 
| Sender: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 10 May 2012 01:33:46 +0000 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| In-Reply-To: |
|
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
| Comments: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Try to think if students will be able to produce visible thinking that can be compared between teams
Open ended might lead to rambling results that aren't comparable enough to generate good discussion
Specific choices often lead to a deeper discussion
Jim Sibley
Sorry for brief message -sent from my iPad
On 2012-05-09, at 6:26 PM, "Carson, Ron" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Must application experiences take the form of questions? Will open-ended case scenarios be effective tools? For example:
>
> An application exercise starts with a brief video of a 104 y/o woman paragliding. I then present teams with the following scenario:
>
> You receive a new referral for a 104 y/o female with a fractured femoral head as a result of a paragliding accident. The patient received a THR (Total Hip Replacement) secondary to the fracture. In addition to your new THR patient, you also have a 75 y/o male with a recent CVA. The patient with the CVA is very depressed over the loss of meaningful occupation.
>
> Using your knowledge on successful aging, critically think to creatively and practically connect the experiences of your two patients
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron Carson
|
|
|
