Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 7 Aug 2010 23:59:14 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Organization: |
Austin Community College |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jennifer, I require my teams to support their decisions with facts from
research or the textbook. I also require them to associate their
decisions with one of the major theories of the discipline. This is what
I grade them on. They also share some of their facts and theories with
the class during the fishbowl (executive council) discussion.
Jennifer Imazeki wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> One more question (sorry to keep bugging you all!): How do people
> grade application exercises, or do you? I've created a number of
> applications that I think meet the 4S criteria but since the group
> responses are all short (or require choosing one option in a
> multiple-choice format), and there's rarely a 'right' answer, I'm not
> sure how to capture the explanation/discussion part. Do you have each
> group submit a written explanation of their responses, in addition to
> whatever comes out in class discussion? Do you somehow grade groups
> based on oral discussion in class? Any suggestions or advice would be
> much appreciated!
>
> thanks and have a great weekend,
> Jennifer
>
>
>
--
Herb Coleman,Ph.D
Dir. Instructional Computing and Technology
Adjunct Professor of Psychology
Austin Community College
Highland Business Center
5930 Middle Fiskville Rd.
Austin, TX 78752
[log in to unmask]
512-223-7746
*************************************************
“I, and every other professor on this campus, are
here to help you to find, take back, and keep your
righteous mind.”
---Professor Melvin Tolson
from the motion picture "The Great Debaters"
*************************************************
|
|
|