Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:38:46 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
That's just about exactly what I do.
Takes me about 2.5 hours to do for a class of 70. I have a system of various windows open on my computer simultaneously (Word and Blackboard) that works for me.
-M
-----Original Message-----
From: Team Learning Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Erica Hunter
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 7:47 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: evaluations
I've had luck doing a midsemester eval where students rated each team
member on a likert like scale for some criteria we developed and then they
were asked to provide a) strengths/contributions of the member and b)
areas they could improve on. We then typed up the results so each person
got individual feedback that was semi-private (they knew what their team
was saying, but couldn't figure it out from handwriting). I did it again
at the end of the term and a lot of teams did improve b/c of the feedback
(the quiet spoke up more, the loud quieted down and listened more). But
that was with 2 instructors and 4 teams of 6-7. It would be doable if you
have a smaller class, TAs OR some time to commit to it. I decided not to
use that format for my 110 enrollments this semester.
Erica
--
Erica Hunter
PhD Candidate
Department of Sociology
University at Albany
|
|
|