The vocabulary piece is why I have seen it used
These inventories personally make me uncomfortable because of there close relationship to the failed construct of learning styles
See http://www.theonion.com/articles/parents-of-nasal-learners-demand-odorbased-curricu,396/
For some fun with learning styles
Jim Sibley
Sorry for brief message -sent from my iPad
On 2013-04-21, at 12:21 PM, "Albright, Alexandra W" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I use Myers-Briggs fairly often to create teams, especially when I really have not much else to work with. Not because I think it is incredibly predictive to make fabulous teams, but because it gives students some vocabulary to talk about their differnces in approaching problems. My students have had fun with it. Here is the link to the test I have them take.
>
> http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim Sibley
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 10:39 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Using "personality types" in team formation...?
>
> Hi Mark
>
> Pete Ostachuk in Mech Eng has been using Myers-briggs for over a decade to help in Forming his tbl teams....he has also done some nice research on it as well
>
> You can contact him at ostafichuk@ mech.ubc.ca.....I know he is about to head out on sabbatical....once he finishes the book chapter he owes me :-)
>
> Jim Sibley
>
> Sorry for brief message -sent from my iPad
>
> On 2013-04-21, at 8:27 AM, Mark Stevens <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> This message was originally submitted by [log in to unmask] to the
>> TEAMLEARNING-L list at LIST.CTLT.UBC.CA. If you simply forward it
>> back to the list, using a mail command that generates "Resent-" fields
>> (ask your local user support or consult the documentation of your mail
>> program if in doubt), it will be distributed and the explanations
>> you are now reading will be removed automatically. If on the other
>> hand you edit the contributions you receive into a digest, you will
>> have to remove this paragraph manually. Finally, you should be able to contact the author of this message by using the normal "reply"
>> function of your mail program.
>>
>> ----------------- Message requiring your approval (30 lines)
>> ------------------ Hi all -
>>
>> I've been thinking a lot about "personality types" lately, and how they might relate to team performance. I would guess that teams with a mixture of different personality types might perform better than those whose students all have the same personality type, and I would also think that it would be good experience for students to have to work with people that have different personality types from their own, independent of whether exposure to different types serves to increase performance.
>>
>> I am curious to know if any of you use personality type (e.g. Myers-Briggs) information to help form teams, and if so, whether you think it's worth the effort. Do you form the teams on the first day of class? When do you ask the students to complete a personality type questionnaire? Do you try to make sure that the personality types are evenly-distributed across the teams, or do you use some other kind of distribution strategy?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>> --
>> Mark Stevens, PhD, MCIP
>> Assistant Professor, School of Community & Regional Planning
>> University of British Columbia
>> 223-1933 West Mall
>> Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
>> http://www.scarp.ubc.ca/profiles/faculty/Mark%20Stevens
>> 604-822-0657
>>
|
