Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:13:19 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-transfer-encoding: |
7bit |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am the Human Genetics course Director for the University of
Pittsburgh School of Medicine. Genetics is a 4 week course and we
have 6 TBLS. TBLs account for 40% of their final grade and here is
how we break up their TBL grade. We give 10% for IRAT, 10% for GRAT,
5% for Peer evaluation and 15% for the application. The application
grade is automatic and students get it for just taking part and
completing the application. There is no formal grade and the only way
their 15% application grade can decrease is if they miss an
application exercise. We felt that the students would appreciate the
application exercise and learn more, if the stress of getting graded
was removed. The GRAT and IRAT are MCQs graded with bubble sheets and
IFAT sheets respectively.
Best wishes
Paula Monaghan-Nichols
On Jun 17, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Jodi Delfosse wrote:
> At the Medical College of Wisconsin, we are transitioning to TBL as
> the primary
> method of student engagement as we are at the same time integrating
> our
> basic and clinical sciences in the first two years. We've read
> what we can
> from a variety of sources, including searching this listserve, but
> are still not
> clear on whether institutions actually grade (or assign points) the
> application
> exercise
|
|
|