TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Meeuwsen, Harry" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Meeuwsen, Harry
Date:
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:40:32 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (103 lines)
Derek Bruff published a book on the use of clickers just last year.
Lots of good practical information and strategies to deal with issues
like this from a wide variety of faculty he interviewed.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_3_5?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-
keywords=bruff+derek&sprefix=bruff 

Harry

-----Original Message-----
From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Jim Sibley
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 10:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: More clicker responses than students in the room

We don't have a great way to deal with this....but a few instructors
have
just seized both clickers....and not returned them till the students
came to
office hours and explained

The issue here might be how points are awarded.....here if students
respond
80% of the time they get full marks....this calms the students down when
batteries go dead, clickers are forgotten, or people are sick

Here in engineering we award points just for participation (answer does
not
need to be right)

In Science here they award both participation and correctness




-- 
Jim Sibley 
Director 
Centre for Instructional Support
Faculty of Applied Science
University of British Columbia
2208-6250 Applied Science Lane
Vancouver, BC Canada
V6T 1Z4 

Phone 604.822.9241 
Fax 604.822.7006 

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca
e-Portfolio:
http://ipeer.apsc.ubc.ca/wiki/index.php/Jim_Sibley_Portfolio


________________________________________________

(c) Copyright 2010, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information
contained
in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively "message") is
intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient (or
recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is not the
intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message
in
error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of this message
is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the message.
 




> From: Michael Sweet <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Michael Sweet <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 11:17:48 -0600
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: More clicker responses than students in the room
> 
> . . . means someone in the room has an absent friend's clicker and is
cheating
> for them.
> 
> Anyone run into this?
> 
> Got any clever, low-hassle methods for identifying the culprits with
classes
> of 100-300?
> 
> -M
> 
> 
> 
> Michael Sweet, Ph.D.
> Faculty Development Specialist
> Division of Instructional Innovation and Assessment (DIIA)
> University of Texas Austin
> MAI 2206 * (512) 232-1775
>  
> "Teaching is the profession that makes all other professions
possible." - Todd
> Witaker

ATOM RSS1 RSS2