Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:38:20 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I strongly recommend closed-book RATs, but open-book on the appeals and
application-focused assignments and activities. A few have tried
open-book RATs in an attempt to try to cut down on students' reading
load. As far as I know, they were all very disappointed in the outcome.
Predictably (you get what you reward), the pre-reading became
pre-skimming and the RAT didn't really accomplish much in terms of
actually getting students ready. A far better solution is being more
selective in what you have students read, but really hold them
accountable for knowing the key ideas.
Larry
Larry K. Michaelsen
Professor of Management
Dockery 400G
Central Missouri State University
Warrensburg, MO 64093
O: 660 543-4124
F: 660 543-8465
>>> Michael Bieber <[log in to unmask]> - 9/7/04 8:42 AM >>>
Hi Everyone,
Does anyone have any guidance on when to have iRATs and tRATs be open
or closed book?
Thanks,
Michael
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Bieber, Associate Professor
- Collaborative Hypermedia Research Lab (Co-Director)
- IS Ph.D. Program (Director)
- Digital Library Service Integration Project (PI)
Email: [log in to unmask] URL: http://web.njit.edu/~bieber
AOL/MSN/Yahoo Instant Messenger: profbieber
Phone: (973) 596-2681 FAX: (973) 596-5777 [email preferred]
Information Systems Department (http://is.njit.edu/)
College of Computing Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology
5500 Information Technology Center
University Heights, Newark, New Jersey 07102-1982 USA
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|